A tribute to the great Clarence Darrow

Blog

Nunc pro tunc affidavit

Posted by geoffrey franklin of the finn clan on June 6, 2011 at 6:25 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________

 

                 Date:__________________________________________

 

 

Geoffrey Franklin Finn

c/o general delivery

VanderburghCounty

Evansville,Indiana Republic

united States of America

zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)

 

 

NUNCPRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND

 

PUBLICNOTICE RESCISSION AFFIDAVIT

 

OFGEOFFREY FRANKLIN FINN

 

 

INDIANASTATE/REPUBLIC   )

                     )               Subscribed,Sworn and Sealed

VANDERBURGHCOUNTY   )

 

 

PREAMBLE

 

      I, State CitizenGeoffrey Franklin Finn, being afree Sovereign adult, natural born in California, living and workingas a State Citizen domiciled in the Indiana Republicsince 1973 and I, as such status, hereby make this SpecialAppearance, by Affidavit, inPropria Persona, proceeding SuiJuris, At Law, in Common Law,with Assistance, Special, neither conferring nor consenting to anyforeign jurisdiction, except to the judicial power of Indiana and/orAmerica, and as such I willfully enforce all Constitutionallimitations respectively on all government agencies when dealing withthem.  Wherefore, the undersigned Affiant, named herein andabove, upon affirmation declares and evidences the following:

 

      

1of 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I, GeoffreyFranklin Finn, am of lawful ageand sound mind.  I am a Sovereign natural born freeState Citizen domiciled in the Indiana Republic (see1:2:2, 1:3:3, 2:1:5, 3:2:1 and 4:2:1 in the U.S. Constitution), andthereby in the united States of America, in fact, by right ofheritage, a Sovereign State Citizen inhabiting and domiciledin the Indiana Republic, protected via hereditary succession by mypredecessors' previous contracts with government as found inthe Northwest Ordinance of 1787,the Organic Act of 1849 (theoriginal Constitution of California),the Articles of Confederation of 1777,the Constitution for the united States of America(1787) including itsPreamble, and the Bill of Rights (1791) includingits Preamble;  and, as such, I retain all my unalienablerights granted by God in positive law, embodied in the Declarationof Independence (1776) andbinding rights upon myself and my parentage, on this day and for alltime now and hereafter.  And further,

 

       I, GeoffreyFranklin Finn, a Sovereignnatural born free State Citizen, inPropria Persona, proceeding SuiJuris, At Law, with Assistance,Special, receiving mail c/o general delivery, Evansville, IndianaRepublic, zip code exempt (DMM 122.32), being duly sworn and affixingmy signature to this document, do hereby make the following statementof fact and affirm:  the so-called "Social Security"number 561-15-2410 is rescinded in application, in bodyand in signature, for I affirm that this agreement was imposed uponme by usage of threat, coercion, withholding of material facts, anduninformed consent, and that I was not at age ofmajority;  therefore, this aforementioned government actionconstitutes constructive fraud and placed me under duress of mind andtherefore deprived me of giving any meaningful consent to theoriginal "Social Security" application and agreement.  Thisagreement is null and void, ab initio (fromits inception), due to the aforementioned fraud.  Andfurther,

 

 AFFIDAVITAMENDMENT PROTECTION CLAUSE

 

       I,the undersigned, in order to protect my unalienable rights to life,liberty and property, inclusive of my right to the proper inrem and inpersonam State Citizenshipstatus, have been forced to amend certain legal documents andstatements, due to the continued revelation and increased discoveryof the continuous acts of fraud upon me by the defacto governments, bothState and Federal, and therefore I declare that I am now and fullyintend to remain free to amend any and all such documents andstatements, as a matter of substantive right, for I cannot be heldliable for either the acts or the omissions by governments which areout of my control, which acts and omissions constitute fraud in oneform or another.  Therefore, I proceed at all times "WITHEXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY UNALIENABLE RIGHTSAND WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OF MY UNALIENABLERIGHTS", inclusive of my personal right to substantive andprocedural due process proceedings under the Judicial Power of bothmy State and my Nation.  And further,

 

      I, GeoffreyFranklin Finn, do state andaffirm the following:

 

       1.    Thatmaterial facts were withheld, such as Title 28,U.S.C., Section 1746, Subsections 1 &2 (being without or within the"United States", respectively), which caused me to beunaware that a completed, signed and submitted "Form 1040"or "income tax return" and other Internal Revenue Serviceand State Franchise Tax Board forms and documentsare voluntarily executed instruments which could beused as primafacie evidence against mein criminal trials and civil proceedings to show that I hadvoluntarily waived my Constitutionally secured rights and that I hadvoluntarily subjected myself to the federal income/excise tax, to theprovisions of the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter referred to asthe IRC),to the authority of the State Franchise Tax Board (hereinafterreferred to as the FTB) and to the authority of the Internal RevenueService (hereinafter referred to as the IRS) by signing and therebyaffirming, under penalty of perjury (within the"United States"), that I was, in effect, a "person"subject to the tax;  that the above induced and/or forcedaction, via State and Federal governments, clearly indicates aviolation of Article1, Section 9, Clause 3 (1:9:3),to wit:  "No Bill of Attainder or expost facto Law shall bepassed" and also Article1, Section 9, Clause 4 (1:9:4),to wit:  "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall belaid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbeforedirected to be taken" in the United StatesConstitution.  Theseabove same injunctions are found in the NorthwestOrdinance and inthe California Constitution.  Andfurther,

 

2.    Thatmaterial facts were withheld, which caused me to be unaware of thelegal effects of signing and filing income tax returns, as shown bythe decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit in the 1974 ruling in the case of Morse v. U.S.,494 F.2d 876, 880, wherein the Court explained how a State Citizenbecame a "taxpayer" by stating:  "Accordingly, whenreturns were filed in Mrs. Morse's name declaring income to her for1944 and 1945, making her potentially liable for the tax due on thatincome, she became a taxpayer within the meaning of theInternal Revenue Code." [emphasis added]  Andfurther,

 2of 10

       3.    Thatmaterial facts were withheld, which caused me to be unaware that thesigning and filing of an income tax return and other IRS forms areacts of voluntary compliance for a Sovereign natural born freeState Citizen inhabiting the united States of America,when executed and submitted by said Sovereign living and workingwithin the States of the Union;  that I was unaware that,in a legislative court such as a United States District Court, thecompleted IRS documents can become primafacie evidence, sufficientto sustain a legal conclusion by a judge, that the signer hasvoluntarily changed his lawful status/state FROM that of a Sovereignnatural born free State Citizen who is not subject to anyfederal income tax and who possesses all of his God-given,Constitutionally secured rights when dealing with government, TO thelegal status of a "taxpayer" (any individual, trust,estate, partnership, association, company or corporation subject tofederal excise tax), that is, a "person" who is subjectto the federal excise tax and is,therefore, subject to the authority, jurisdiction and control of thefederal government under the IRC,to the statutes governing federal taxation and to the regulations ofthe IRS, thereby imposing the tax on himself, waiving his God-givenConstitutionally secured rights to property and labor in respect tothe federal income/excise tax statutes and their administration bythe IRS, and establishing himself as one who has privileges only, butno rights, in dealings with the IRS, the same as a corporation;  thatit is my understanding that the change of status/state resulting fromthe signed IRS documents is very similar to the change of status thatoccurs when one enlists in the military service and voluntarily takesan oath that subjects him to the authority, jurisdiction and controlof the federal government under Title 10 of the United States Code(i.e.,the statutes governing the armed forces and the regulations of themilitary service), thereby waiving his Constitutionally guaranteedrights in relation to dealings with the military services.  Andfurther,

 

       4.    ThatI, as a Sovereign natural born free State Citizen andinhabitant in the united States of America, domiciled in the IndianaRepublic, and as a Free Man, am endowed by my Creator with numerousunalienable/inalienable rights which include but are not limited tomy rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness(property)", which rights are specifically identified inthe Magna Carta (1215) andthe Declaration of Independence (1776),and protected and secured by the Constitution for theunited States of America (1789) andthe subsequent Bill of Rights, Articles in Amendment 1thru 10 (1791);  thatmy birthright to the "life, liberty and the pursuit ofhappiness" has been interpreted by both the Framers of theConstitution and by the U.S. Supreme Court to include my unalienableright to contract, to acquire, to deal in, to sell, rent, andexchange properties of various kinds, real and personal, withoutrequesting or exercising any privilege or franchise fromgovernment;  that Ihave learned that these unalienable property rights also include myright to contract for the exchange of my labor-property for otherproperties and remuneration, such as wages, salaries, and otherearnings; that I have never knowingly, intentionally orvoluntarily waived any of these unalienable rights, nor canI, Geoffrey Franklin Finn,be forced to waive any ofthese rights granted to me by God the Father, my Creator, because Iam endowed with these rights by my Creator and by nobody else andnothing else (see Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 at 748(1970)).  And further,

 

       5.    That I understand that, if the exercise of myrights were subjected to taxation, these same rights could bedestroyed by increasing the tax rates to unaffordablelevels;  therefore, courts have repeatedly ruled thatgovernment has no power whatsoever to tax or otherwise "lien"against the exercise of any rights,particularly the rights of Sovereign State Citizens, asshown by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Murdockv. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), which stated:  "Astate may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted bythe Federal Constitution."; that unalienablerights are rights againstwhich no lien can be established precisely because they areun-lien-able;  that America's founding documentsenumerate some ofmy unalienable rights, noneof which rights I haveever waived knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally;  thatI freely choose to obey all American Law and to pay all Lawful taxesin jurisdictions which are applicable to me for the commongood;  that I stand inPropria Persona withAssistance, Special;  that my status and unalienablerights, as stated hereinafter and in the foregoing, are notnegotiable.  Andfurther,

 

       6.    That,for years past and at least since the year 1984, I have beeninfluenced by numerous cases of people going to jail and beingpunished, and also by numerous and repeated public warnings made bythe FTB and by the IRS, via radio, television, the printed press andother forms of public communication media, warning of the "deadline"for filing State and Federal forms, such as a "Form 1040 IncomeTax Return" and/or other IRS forms and documents;  thistherefore caused me to file said forms under threat, duress andcoercion.  And further,

 

       7.    That,in addition to the aforesaid warnings, I have also been influenced bythe misleading and deceptive wording of IRS publications andIRS-generated news articles, by the pressure of widespread rumors andmisinformed public opinion, which misled me to believe incorrectlythat the 16th Amendment to the Constitution for the united States ofAmerica abolished the Fifth Amendment of that same Constitution andauthorized Congress to impose a direct tax onme, my

3of 10

property,my exchanges of property and/or property received as a result ofexercising my Constitutionally secured right to contract;  thatI was further misled into believing that I had a legal duty andobligation to file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" andother IRS and State tax forms, schedules and documents, and that Iwas unaware of 28 U.S.C. 1746,wherein there are two perjury clauses:  (1) one statingthat you are without the"United States" and also (2) the other stating that youare within the"United States", respectively.  The perjuryclauses on both State and Federal tax forms stipulate, under penaltyof perjury, that I was stating unknowingly, involuntarily and  unintentionally  that I was within the"United States".  This is an act of fraud by bothState and Federal taxing agencies. And further,

 

                8.    ThatI have also been further influenced, misled and alarmed by rumors, bymisinformed public opinion to the effect that "the IRS and theFTB will get you", and that it would be a crime punishable byfines and/or imprisonment if I did not fill out, sign and file withthe IRS a "Form 1040";  that, in point of fact,the only person actually named within the IRC asa person required to collect an income tax, to file anincome tax return and to pay an income tax is a "WithholdingAgent";  and that, to the best of my knowledge, I amnot now, nor have I ever been a "Withholding Agent".  Andfurther,

 

       9.    That,in addition to all of the reasons stated in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8above, I was influenced by the common and widespread practice ofemployers who, either knowingly or unknowingly, without Power ofAttorney, misled me and their employees to believe that they andI must have a Social Security Number and that allare subject to the withholding of "income taxes" from theirearnings, either with or without their permission, based upon theemployers' possibly mistaken assumption that they, as employers, arerequired by law to withhold "income taxes" from thepaychecks of their employees, which is contrary to the Sections3402(n), 7343 and 7701(a)(16) ofthe IRC, absenta voluntary execution of Form W-4, the "Employee's WithholdingAllowance Certificate".  And further,

 

       10.   ThatI have also been mistakenly influenced and mistakenly impressed byannual public displays and indiscriminate public offerings by the IRSand the FTB of large quantities of the Forms 1040 and 540 in banks,in post offices and through the U.S. mail, which public displays andindiscriminate public offerings also had the effect of reminding meof, and inducing me to respond mistakenly by filling out, signing andsending "Form 1040" to the IRS and "Form 540" tothe FTB.  And further,

 

       11.   Thatsaid "Forms 1040" contained no reference to any law or lawswhich would explain just exactly who is and who isnot subject to, or liable for, the income tax, State orFederal, nor did it contain any notice or warning to anyone thatmerely sending said completed "Form 1040" to the IRS wouldwaive my right to privacy, as secured by the 4th Amendment in theU.S. Constitution, and also waive my right to not be a witnessagainst myself, as secured by the 5th Amendment in the U.S.Constitution, and that a completed "Form 1040" would, initself, constitute legal evidence, admissible in a court of law, thatthe filer is subject to and liable for the income/excise tax, eventhough and regardless of the fact that I, as a Sovereign natural bornfree State Citizen, am actually and legally not subject to thestatutory jurisdiction of the IRC,nor liable for any income/excise tax, and regardless of the factthat, to the best of my knowledge, I have no legal duty or obligationwhatsoever to complete and file any "Form 1040" or Stateincome tax forms, nor did they ever evidence 28 U.S.C.1746.  And further,

 

       12.   Thatat no time was I ever notified or informed by the IRS or by the Stateof Indiana, nor by any of their agents or employees, nor by anylawyer, C.P.A., or tax preparer, of the fact that the so-called 16thAmendment in the U.S. Constitution, as correctly interpreted by theU.S. Supreme Court in such cases as Brushaber v. UnionPacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916) and Stanton v.Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916), identified the income taxas an indirect excise tax in accordance with Article1, Section 8, Clause 1 (1:8:1) of the United States Constitution;that the so-called 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ascorrectly interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, does not authorizea tax on all individuals but is applicableto nonresident aliens (e.g.,Frank R. Brushaber) who involve themselves in activities, events oroccupations which come under, or are within,the taxing authority of the "United States", as explainedin TreasuryDecision 2313, dated March 21,1916;  that the so called 16th Amendment was neveractually ratified nor could it have been enacted into positive lawbecause the requisite number of States (i.e.,36) did not meetthe lawful requirements for amending the Constitution at thattime;  and that a mass of incontrovertible materialevidence available since the year 1985 proves that the act of"declaring" the so-called 16th Amendment "ratified"was an act of outright fraud by Philander C. Knox in the year1913.  And further,

 

      13.   Thatat no time was I ever notified or informed by the FTB nor by the IRS,their agents or employees, nor by any

4of 10

lawyer,C.P.A. or tax preparer, of the fact that, because of various rulingsof the U.S. Supreme Court in such cases as Flint v. StoneTracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911), andPollock v. Farmer's Loanand Trust Co., 157 U.S. 492 (1895), the indirectexcise tax on incomesidentified by the so-called 16th Amendment is also a taxupon corporate privilegesgranted by government, which tax is measured by the amountof corporate income(see CorporationsTax Act, Statutes at Large, 1909, vol. XXXVI, section 38, page112);  thatthis indirect excise tax isalso imposed on the taxable income of foreign corporations, and onthe taxable income of nonresident aliens to the extent this (latter)income is either effectively connectedwith the conduct of a tradeor business within the corporate jurisdiction of the "UnitedStates", or derived from sourceswithin the corporate jurisdiction of the "United States"although not effectivelyconnected with the conduct of trade or business within the corporatejurisdiction of the "United States", according to Sections871 and 872 of the IRC. Andfurther,

 

       14.   Thatmy attention has been called to Report No. 80-19A,entitled "Some Constitutional Questions Regarding the FederalIncome Tax Laws" published by the American Law Division of theCongressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, updatedJanuary 17, 1980;  that this publication describes the taxon "income" identified in the so-called 16th Amendment tothe U.S. Constitution as an indirect excise tax;  thatthis report stated: "The Supreme Court, in a decisionwritten by Chief Justice White, first noted that the 16th Amendmentdid not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revokethe tax clauses of Article I of the United States Constitution,quoted above.";  and this report furtherstated:  "Therefore, it can clearly be determined fromthe decisions of the United States Supreme Court that the income taxis an indirect tax, generally in the nature of an excise tax ....",thus proving in my mind that the "income tax" is not a taxon me as a Sovereign natural born free State Citizen, butis, rather, an indirect excise tax asdescribed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Flint v.Stone Tracy Co. supra,wherein the high Court defined excise taxes as "... taxes laidupon the manufacture, sale, or consumption of commodities within thecountry, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and uponcorporate privileges ....", none of which aforesaidclassifications apply to me.  And further,

 

            15.   ThatI was unaware of the truth of the rarely publicized statement by theIRS that the "income" tax system is based upon "voluntarycompliance with the law and self-assessment of tax";  thatI was unaware before June of 1990 of a posted notice in the mainlobby of the Federal Building in San Francisco, California, outsidethe offices of the IRS, which notice reads, in pertinent part, "Thepurpose of the Internal Revenue Service is to ... encourage andachieve the highest degree of voluntary compliance inaccordance with the tax laws and regulations.";  thatI was unaware before June of 1990 that Mr. Roger M. Olsen, AssistantAttorney General, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington,D.C., made the following statement to an assemblage of tax lawyers onMay 9, 1987:  "We encourage voluntarycompliance by scaring theheck out of you.";  that it has never been either myintention nor my desire to voluntarily self-assess an excise tax uponmyself, nor to give up my right to property, nor to voluntarilysubject myself to such an excise tax; that I had always thoughtthat compliance was required bylaw.  And further,

 

       16.   ThatI have examined Sections 871 thru 878, 1441, 1442,1443, 3401(c), 6001, 6011, 6012(a), 6331(a), 7203, 7205 and 7343 ofthe IRC, and Iam entirely convinced and completely satisfied that I am not now, norwas I ever, any such "person" or individual referred to bythese sections.  And further,

 

       17.   That,I have never been shown nor has any U. S. corporate official everpresented to me any sections of the IRC thatimposed any requirement on me as a Sovereign natural born freeState Citizen, non-enumerated and unprivilegedinhabitant, living and working within a County within a State of theUnion, to file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" or any otherState income tax form, or that imposed a requirement upon me to pay atax on "income", or that would classify me as a "personliable", as a "person made liable", or as a "taxpayer"as the term "taxpayer" is defined in IRCSection 7701(a)(14), whichstates:  "The term 'taxpayer' means any person subjectto any internal revenue tax."  And further,

 

       18.   Thatthe only mention of any possible requirement upon me, as a Sovereignnatural born State Citizen to pay a tax on "income", that Icould find, or was shown in the IRC,was the title of Part I under Subtitle A, Chapter 1,Subchapter A (which isdeceptively titled "Tax on Individuals") and Section6012(a), Subtitle F, Chapter 61-A, Part II-B, Subpart B, andthe  Indiana Tax Statutes;  thata careful study and earnest examination of these parts ofthe IRC revealedthat the "individuals" to whom these sections refer are, infact, either individualswho work within a foreign nation like France and are taxed accordingto a tax treaty, or theyare nonresident aliens who receive income which is either effectivelyconnected with theconduct of a trade or business within the corporate jurisdiction ofthe "United States", or derived from sourceswithin the corporate jurisdiction of the "United States",although not effectivelyconnected with the conduct of trade or

5of 10

businesswithin the corporate jurisdiction of the "United States",according to Sections 871 and 872 of the IRC;  andthat, to the best of my knowledge, I have never conducted any tradeor business within the corporate jurisdiction of the "UnitedStates", nor have I ever derived income from sources within thecorporate jurisdiction of the "United States". Andfurther,

 

       19.   Thatmy attention was called to the IRC, Chapter 21,entitled "Federal Insurance Contributions Act" (SocialSecurity), and my attention was also called to SubchapterA of Chapter 21 entitled"Tax on Employees", which includes Section 3101, whereinthe Social Security tax is identified as a tax on "income", not asan "Insurance Contribution", not asa "Tax on Employees", and notasa tax on wages or earnings;  that my attention was furthercalled to these facts:  there is no provision inthe IRC thatimposes the tax on employees or requires them to pay the tax;  avoluntarily signed and completed Form W-4, "Employee'sWithholding Allowance Certificate", allows an employer towithhold money from a worker's pay for Social Security "income"tax, even though the worker has claimed on that form to be "exempt"from the graduated "income" tax;  and an employerhas no authority to withhold money from a worker'spay for the Social Security "income" tax, for the graduated"income" tax, nor for any IRS imposed penalty orassessment, if there is no voluntarily signed "FormW 4" in force and no"Form 2678" inforce Granting Power of Attorney.  Andfurther,

 

   20.   Thatmy attention was called to Section 61(a) of the IRC,which lists items that are sources of"income", and to the following facts:  that IRSCollections Summons Form 6638 (12 82) confirmsthat these items are sources,not "income", by stating that the following items are"sources":  "wages, salaries, tips, fees,commissions, interest, rents, royalties, alimony, state or local taxrefunds, pensions, business income, gains from dealings in property,and any other compensations for services (including receipt ofproperty other than money).";  that sourcesare not "income", butsources become "income"if they are entered as "income" on a signed "Form1040", because the signer affirms, under penalty ofperjury (within the"United States"), that the items entered in the "income"section of the "Form 1040" are "income" to thesigner;  that Section61(b) clearly indicateswhich sections of the IRC identifyand list items that are included in "income" bystating:  "For items specifically included in grossincome, see Part II (sec. 71 and following)".  Andfurther,

 

       21.   Thatit appears entirely clear to me that the only way thatproperty received by me as a Sovereign natural born freeState Citizen, living and working within the States ofthe Union, in the form of wages, salaries, commissions, tips,interest, dividends, rents, royalties and/or pensions could be, orcould have been legally considered to be "income", is ifI voluntarily completed and signed a "Form 1040Income Tax Return", thereby affirming, under penalty of perjury(within the"United States"), that the information on such "Form1040" was true and correct, and that any amounts listed on the"Form 1040" in the "income" block were "income",and thereby acknowledging under oath or affirmation, that I am, orwas, a taxpayer subject to the tax and have, or had, a duty to file a"Form 1040 Income Tax Return" and/or other IRS forms,documents and schedules, none of which instruments I have ever signedwith the understanding that I signed them knowingly, voluntarily andintentionally and by means of knowingly intelligent acts done "withsufficient awareness of all the relevant circumstances and likelyconsequences" (see Brady v. U.S. supra).  Andfurther,

 

       22.   That,with good faith, with an honest reliance upon the aforementioned U.S.Supreme Court rulings and with reliance upon my constitutionallyprotected Natural Common Law Bill ofRights, Amendments1 thru 10 (1791), to lawfullycontract, to lawfully work and to lawfully acquire and possessproperty, I am convinced and satisfied that I am not now, nor was Iever subject to, liable for, or required to pay an income/excisetax;  that I am not now, nor have I ever been a "taxpayer",and there has never been a Judicial Power proceeding in which it wasruled that I was a "taxpayer" as that term is defined andused in the IRC;  andthat I have never had any legal duties or obligations whatsoever tofile any "Form 1040" or to make any "income taxreturn", or to sign or submit any other IRS "individual"forms or documents or schedules, to pay any "individual"income tax, to keep any personalfinancial records, or to supply any personalinformation to the IRS.  And further,

 

 

       23.   That the U.S. Congress, the International Monetary Fund, the FederalReserve Banks and the Internal Revenue Service, by means of vague,deceptive and misleading words and statements in the IRC,in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), in official statements byIRS Commissioners in the Federal Register, in IRS publicationsand in IRS-generated news articles, committed constructivefraud and misrepresentation by misleading and deceiving me,as well as the general public, into believing that I was required tofile "Form 1040 Income Tax Returns" and other IRS forms,documents and schedules and that I was also required to keep records,to supply information and to pay income taxes.  Andfurther,

 

 

24.   That,by reason of the aforementioned facts, I do hereby exercise my rightsas a Sovereign natural born free

6of 10

State Citizen,upheld by various court decisions, to rescind, tocancel and to render null and void, NuncPro Tunc, both currently andretroactively to the time of signing, based upon the constructivefraud and misrepresentation perpetrated upon me by the Federalgovernment, the U.S. Congress, the IRS, the "State of Indiana",all IRS and FTBforms, statements,documents, returns, schedules, contracts, licenses, applications,articles, certificates and/or commercial agreements eversigned and/or submitted by me, or on my behalf by third parties(including but not limited to Forms 1040 and attached schedules,Forms W-2, Forms W-4, and Forms 1099) on the accounts bearing theaccount numbers 561-15-2410, and allmy signatures on any andall of the aforementioned items, including the original "SocialSecurity" application, which caused the account bearing theaccount number 561-15-2410 to be established;  thatthis notice of rescission is based upon my rights with respect toconstructive fraud and misrepresentation as established in, but notlimited to, the cases of Tyler v. Secretary of State, 184F.2d 101 (1962) and also El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. KysarInsurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d 240 (1979), whichstated:  "Constructive fraud as well as actual fraudmay be the basis of cancellation of an instrument."  And further,

 

       25.   That I do hereby declare that I am not and neverwas a "taxpayer"as that term is defined in the IRC,a "person liable" for any internal revenue tax, or a"person" subject to the provisions of the IRC,and I do hereby declare that I am, and have always been, a"nontaxpayer";  that courts have recognized andacknowledged that individuals can be nontaxpayers, "... for withthem Congress does not assume to deal and they are neither thesubject nor the object of revenue laws ....", as stated in thecases of Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236 (1922), DeLima v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 176, 179, and Gerth v. UnitedStates, 132 F. Supp. 894 (1955).  And further,

 

       26.   That evidence now available to me proves that the Internal Revenue Servicehas to date failed to comply with the clear and unambiguousrequirements imposed on all federalgovernment agencies by the following Congressional statutes: theFederal Register Act (44 U.S.C. 1501 etseq.), the AdministrativeProcedures Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.),and the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 etseq.);  that the IRSfailure to comply with the requirements of these statutes constitutesfurther constructivefraud, breach of fiduciarytrust between Sovereign State Citizens and publicservants, and violations of the solemn oaths of office required offederal government officials, thereby relieving me of any and alllegal duties which could or might otherwise exist for me tofile any returns,schedules, or other documents with the IRS;  and that,after having read these three statutes and summaries of related caselaw, I thereby conclude that there is noreason why the IRS wouldbe exempt from any of the clear and unambiguous requirements imposedupon federal government agencies by these three statutes,notwithstanding any and all allegations to the contrary thatheretofore may have been published by the IRS or the TreasuryDepartment in the Federal Register without alsociting the proper legal authorities, if any, for suchallegations.  And further,

 

 

   27.   That prolonged studies have convinced me of the above, and that as such Iam not "subject to" the territorially limited "exclusivelegislation" nor to the foreign jurisdiction mandated for theDistrict of Columbia, federal enclaves, federal territories, federalpolitical subdivisions and federal possessions by Article 1, Section8, Clauses 17 and 18 and Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S.Constitution, including its "internal" governmentalorganizations therein (hereinafter referred to as the "FederalLegislative Democracy" and elsewhere referred to in thisAffidavit as the "corporate jurisdiction of the UnitedStates");  that I am not "subject to" thisforeign jurisdiction by reason of any validcontract or any  validcommercial agreement resulting in adhesion thereto across America,nor are millions of other Sovereign State Citizens,unless they have provided "waivers of rights guaranteed by theConstitution" by means of "knowingly intelligent acts",such as contracts or commercial agreements with suchgovernment(s) "with sufficient awareness of the relevantcircumstances and likely consequences", as ruled by the U.S.Supreme Court in Brady v. United States supra;  andthat I myself have given nosuch "waivers".  Andfurther,

 

            28.   Thatthese same diligent studies have also proved to me thatmisrepresentation and a shrewd and criminal constructivefraud have beenperpetrated upon Sovereign State Citizens by government,under counterfeit "color of law", through the apparententrapments of "certain activities (monopoly occupations),corporate franchises, and privileges (other benefits)" allowedby statutory acts or otherwise;  that, by reason ofAmerican Law which has never been repealed, such sources of past andpresent criminal element in and behind government should be broughtto justice in a Constitutional Court of Law for aiding andabetting  thismisrepresentation and constructive fraud as willingaccomplices;  that it is for such a Court, with a 12-memberjury of peers, to decide who is and who is not guilty among personnelof government, media, schools, lawyers, accountants, clergy and otherpurveyors of misinformation and other mind-set propaganda, in thisand related regards.  And further,

 

 

7of 10

 

       29.   That, due to such shrewd entrapments over many years, I may haveunwittingly signed some related documents, contracts and commercialagreements, maybe some even under the "perjury" jurat(within the"United States") as was supposedly required;  withAmerican Law on my side, I hereby rescind andcancel any and all suchsignatures and render them null and void, nuncpro tunc, except for those whichI may choose to have considered as being under "TDC"(Threat,Duress and/or Coercion), past andpresent;  that this is also my lawfulnotice that all suchsignatures of mine in the future on instruments of government orother entities, including banks, which might otherwise result incontract adhesion, are to be considered as being under "TDC",whether appearing therewith or otherwise;  that myConstitutional "Privileges and Immunities" (per Article 4,Section 2) are apart from thosemandated for the Federal Legislative Democracy by Article 1, Section8, Clauses 17 and 18 and by Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2, and shallnot by Law be violated ever;  andthat my status, in accord, is stated for all to see and to know in1:2:2, 1:3:3, 2:1:5, 3:2:1 and 4:2:1 of the Constitution for theunited States of America.  And further,

 

 

  30.   That,with this accurate knowledge and with "the supreme Law of theLand" (Article 6, Section 2) again on my side, I do Lawfully and"squarely challenge" the fraudulent, usurping, octopus-likeauthority and jurisdiction cited above in paragraph 28, whichauthority and jurisdiction do not apply tome (see Hagans v.Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 at 533);  it is, therefore,now mandatory forany personnel of the Federal Legislative Democracy or its agents toFIRST PROVE its"jurisdiction", if any, over me before anyfurther procedures can take place in my regard, per Title 5, UnitedStates Code, "Government Organization and Employees",Section 556(d), specifically by disclosing in writing any and allcontracts or other commercial agreements whereby the FederalLegislative Democracy and its agents claim to have obtainedcontrolling interest in me such that my specific performance to anythird party debt or obligation can be compelled;  ORELSE any of its personneland accomplices who willfully violate this statute can and shall bepersonally charged as citizens underTitle 18, United States Criminal Code, Sections 241, 242, 1001 and/orotherwise;  and, in fairness, it must be added that, to myknowledge, IRS agents have NO written lawful "Delegation ofAuthority" within the 50 States of the Union and their so called"Form 1040" appears to be a bogus andbootleg documenton its face.  And further,

 

             31.   That,with all of the above in mind, it appears that thisSovereign natural born free State Citizen is, by Law,as "foreign" and as much a NONRESIDENT ALIEN withrespect to the FederalLegislative Democracy as he is to France, and thus shall be free touse related Forms of the Federal Legislative Democracy if and whenthey might be needed, required and/or appropriate at various futuretimes and places yet to be determined (see paragraphs 12, 13 and 18above), including but not limited to Form W-8 ("Certificate ofForeign Status") or its equivalent for banks and/or otherfinancial institutions.  And further,

 

       32.   That, since my date of birth on January 4, 1960, I have always beena NONRESIDENT ALIEN withrespect to the FederalLegislative Democracy of the "United States", never havingresided, worked, nor having any income, to the best of myrecollection, from any sources within the District of Columbia,Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, Northern MarianaIslands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands or any otherterritory or possession within the "United States", whichentity obtains its exclusive legislative authority and jurisdictionfrom Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 17 and 18 and Article 4, Section3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution;  that I have alwaysbeen a non-taxpayer outside the venue and jurisdiction ofthe IRC; that,to the best of my knowledge, I have never had any "U.S. trade orbusiness" as defined in the IRC,in 26 C.F.R. orin 27 C.F.R.;  that,to the best of my knowledge, I have never had any "gross income"from any U.S. sources, as the term "gross income" isdefined in IRC Section872(a).  And further,

 

 

33.   ThatI was neither born nor naturalized in the "United States",I have never been subject to its jurisdiction, and Ihave never been a "United States citizen" asdefined in 26 C.F.R. 1.1-1(c) andas defined in the so-called 14th Amendment to the U.S.Constitution.  And further,

 

       34.   That the federal government has committed fraud, duress and coercion,exercised undue influence, and evidenced unlawful menace against theAmerican people by representing the so-called 14th Amendment as alawfully ratified amendment in the U.S. Constitution, when contraryproof, published court authorities and other competent legal scholarshave now established that it was NOT lawfully ratified.  (See Statev. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936 (1975); Dyett v. Turner,439 P.2d 266 (1968);  28 Tulane LawReview 22;  11 South CarolinaLaw  Quarterly 484.)  And further,

 

           35.   That I am not now, nor have I ever knowingly, intentionally andvoluntarily, with informed consent, entered into any personal,internal, public or private agreement, contract, stipulation, accountor similar contrivance with the

8of 10

"UnitedStates", the "Federal Government" or the "Districtof Columbia", its territories, its agencies or other propertyappurtenant thereto, which would have altered or waived my dejure, SuiJuris status, or myunalienable God-given natural rights;  that any suchagreements or contracts, expressed or implied, such as a SocialSecurity number and application, or Driver's License, or BankSignature Card, or the use of Federal Reserve Notes (which are notlawful Specie per the Coinage Act of 1792) etc., have all been herebyrescinded ab initio,due to the fraudulent withholding of material facts, which became asnare and a trap and, as such, are a Bill of Attainder on thisSovereign natural born free State Citizen and inhabitantin the united States of America, for I cannot become a nexus by theeffect of a fraudulent nexum, because my status and unalienablenatural rights are not negotiable, and the government, both State andFederal, has not proved that they ever had jurisdiction to change mystatus, as required by Title5 U.S.C. Section 556(d), or asdefined and set out as a Constitutional requirement in Hagansv. Lavine supra (seealso Bradyv. U.S. supra);  thatany change of status would lawfully have to take place in a CommonLaw (judicial power) court under the due process clause of the 5thAmendment to the U.S. Constitution.  And further,

 

       36.   That this is to certify that I, Geoffrey Franklin Finn,am a Sovereign natural born free State Citizen andinhabitant in the united States of America, domiciled in the IndianaRepublic, living and working in Vanderburgh County, living underGod's Law, the Common Law, having assumed, among the powers of theEarth, the Separate and Equal Station to which the Laws of Nature andNature's God entitles me, in order to secure the Blessings of Libertyto Myself and my Posterity, and in order to re-acquire the Birthrightthat was taken from me by fraud, do hereby asseverate nuncpro tunc and rescind, abinitio, all feudatory contractswith the Federal government and its agencies, and with the corporateState of Indiana and its agencies;  for I,Geoffrey Franklin Finn, beingof sound mind and body, do not choose, nor have I ever chosen, togive up, relinquish or otherwise waive any ofmy God given, natural, fundamental, Constitutionally securedrights.  And further,

 

 

37.   Tha tmy use of the phrase "WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTSAND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308 (UCCA 1308)" above my signatureon this document indicates:  (1) that I explicitly rejectany and all benefits of the Uniform Commercial Code, absent a validcommercial agreement which is in force and to which I am a party, andcite its provisions herein only toserve notice upon ALL agencies of government, whether international,national, state or local, that they, and not I, are subject to, andbound by, all of its provisions, whether cited herein or not;  (2)that my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon ALLagencies of government of the "Remedy" they must providefor me under Article 1, Section 308 of the Uniform Commercial Code,whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law right not to becompelled to perform under any contractor commercial agreement into which I have notentered knowingly, voluntarily,and intentionally;  (3)that my explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon ALLagencies of government that they are ALL limited to proceedingagainst me only in harmony with the Common Law and that I do not, andwill not, accept the liability associated with the "compelled"benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements;  and  (4)that my valid reservation of rights has preserved all myrights and prevented the loss of any such rights by application ofthe concepts of waiver or estoppel.  And further,

 

 

       38.   ThatI reserve my unalienable right to amend this Affidavit at times andplaces of my own choosing, according as new facts and revelations aremade available to me at various future times and places as yetunknown, and as yet to be determined, given the massive fiscal fraudwhich has now been sufficiently revealed to me by means of materialand other reliable evidence which constitutes satisfactory andincontrovertible proof of the fraud to which I refer in thisparagraph and elsewhere in this Affidavit.  And further,

 

       39.   That I affirm, under penalty of perjury, under the Common Law ofAmerica, without the "United States", that theforegoing is true and correct, to the best of my current information,knowledge and belief,  and

 

 

 

 Further This Affiant saith not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9of 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribed and affirmed to Nunc Pro Tunc on the date of mymajority, which day was January 4th, 1978.

 

 Subscribed,sealed and affirmed to this  __________  day of__________, 2011.

 

Inow affix my own signature to all of the above affirmations WITHEXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308(UCCA 1308) (see paragraph 37 above):

 

 _________________________________________________________________

GeoffreyFranklin Finn, State Citizen and Principal, byspecial Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding SuiJuris, with Assistance, Special, with explicit reservationof all my unalienable rights and without prejudiceto any of my unalienable rights.

 

GeoffreyFranklin Finn

c/ogeneral delivery

EvansvillePost Office [ZIP code exempt]

Indiana,USA

 

 

 

 INDIANASTATE/REPUBLIC       )

                                )

COUNTYOF VANDERBURGH )

 

 

 

   Onthe ________ day of ____________, 2011 Anno Domini,before me personally appeared GeoffreyFranklin Finn, personally knownto me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to bethe human being whose name is subscribed to the within instrument andacknowledged to me that he executed the same in His authorizedcapacity, and that by His signature on this instrument the humanbeing, or the entity upon behalf of which the human beiing acted,executed the instrument.  Purpose of Notary Public is foridentification only, and not for entrance into anyforeign jurisdiction.

 

WITNESSmy hand and official seal.

 

 _____________________________________

NotaryPublic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10of 10

 

 

 

 

Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

0 Comments